"Don't you hate pants?!"

This guy does, at least when they're worn by embittered, man-hatin', bull-dyke feminazis (you can always spot them 'cause they wear pants.)

What's not sexy is feminism (not to be confused with femininity), which is directly responsible for the disappearance of our beloved dresses and the adoption of pants by the "new woman." Like all fashions, pants are symbolic of something - in this case masculinity - through their allowance of physical activity. Dresses, the antithesis of pants, symbolize femininity through grace and elegance. Men find elegance in women to be attractive, and dresses are a physical manifestation of femininity. The wearing of pants by women represents the masculinization of the fairer sex, which is not at all attractive.

I don't know about you, but this is exactly the kind of guy whom I'd look to when wondering "what is sexy?"

Of course he doesn't just hate uppity trouser bitches: in the comments, he makes it clear he doesn't like faggy dudes either:

If it helps, I think that men have a specified place in society, and I'm equally offended by men with tight pants, pink shirts, and long hair.

Oh, it helps. It helps a lot.